Compare Mercedes C-Class Coupe C204 vs BMW M3 E92 Coupe vs BMW 2 Series F22

Mercedes-Benz C-Class C204 Coupe (2011-2015)

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

BMW | Cars

Variants

C 180

C 180 AT

C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY

C 180 BlueEFFICIENCY AT

C 200

C 200 AT

C 220 CDI

C 220 CDI AT

C 250 AT

C 250 CDI

C 250 CDI AT

C 350 AT

C 63 AMG

C 63 AMG Black Series

C 63 AMG Edition 507

C 63 AMG Performance

M3 DCT

M3 GTS DCT

218d B47

218d B47 AT

218d N47

218d N47 AT

218i

218i AT

220d B47 xDrive AT

220d N47

220d N47 AT

220i

220i AT

220i Euro6

220i Euro6 AT

225d B47 AT

225d N47 AT

228i

228i AT

230i

230i AT

M235i

M235i AT

M235i xDrive AT

M240i

M240i AT

M240i xDrive AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

450 L / 15.9 cu-ft

390 L / 13.8 cu-ft

Engine Oil Capacity

8.8 L / 9.3 qt

Fuel Capacity

63.0 L / 16.6 gal

52.0 L / 13.7 gal

Passengers

Payload

510 kg / 1124 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Ventilated discs

Disc

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Construction

Body Style

2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height

1406 mm / 55.4 in

Size | Width

1804 mm / 71.0 in

1774 mm / 69.8 in

Track Width | Front

1549.0 mm / 61.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1552.0 mm / 61.1 in

1539.0 mm / 60.6 in

Wheelbase

2760 mm / 108.7 in

2690 mm / 105.9 in

Performance

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Euro 6

Engine | Bore

92.0 mm / 3.6 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

12.0:1

Engine | Type

Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 4 values per cylinder

Reviews

Neofiliac score

75%

78%

77%

Pros

Several versions of the NA C63 AMG
Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Rather robust drivetrain

Characterful, high-revving S65 V8
New DCT that replaced the SMG
Good styling

Better styled than the 1 Series Coupe E82
Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low official fuel consumption

Cons

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Lower grade of build than the CLK

Unreliable engine

Some unreliable engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.