Compare Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 vs Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe C238 facelift vs Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209

Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe C238 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLK C209Mercedes-Benz E-Class Coupe C238 faceliftMercedes-Benz CLK C209 facelift
Variants
CLK 200 CGI
CLK 200 CGI AT
CLK 200 Kompressor
CLK 200 Kompressor AT
CLK 240
CLK 240 AT
CLK 270 CDI
CLK 270 CDI AT
CLK 320 AT
CLK 500 5AT
CLK 500 7AT
CLK 55 AMG
AMG E 53 4MATIC+
E 200 4MATIC
E 200
E 220d 4MATIC
E 220d
E 300
E 300d 4MATIC
E 400d 4MATIC
E 450 4MATIC
CLK 63 AMG
CLK 200 Kompressor 163
CLK 200 Kompressor 184
CLK 200 Kompressor 184 AT
CLK 220 CDI
CLK 220 CDI AT
CLK 280
CLK 280 AT
CLK 320 CDI
CLK 320 CDI AT
CLK 350 AT
CLK 500 M113 AT
CLK 500 M273 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score72%71%79%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Decent styling
  • Robust engine lineup
  • OK-ish performance
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Overall good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Robust drivetrain
Cons
  • CLK 55 AMG is not supercharged
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Rather ugly
  • AWD
  • No V8
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.