Compare Mercedes-Benz CLS C218 vs Mercedes-Benz E-class W212 facelift vs Saab 9-5 (YS3E) facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLS C218

Mercedes-Benz E-class W212 facelift

Saab 9-5 (YS3E) facelift

Mercedes-Benz CLS C218Mercedes-Benz E-class W212 faceliftSaab 9-5 (YS3E) facelift
Variants
CLS 250 CDI
CLS 350
CLS 350 BlueTEC 4MATIC
CLS 350 CDI
CLS 350 CDI 4MATIC
CLS 500
CLS 500 4MATIC
CLS 63 AMG
CLS 63 AMG 4MATIC
E 200
E 200 CDI
E 200 CDI MT
E 200 MT
E 220 BlueTEC
E 220 BlueTEC 4MATIC
E 220 CDI
E 220 CDI MT
E 250
E 250 CDI
E 250 CDI 4MATIC
E 250 CDI MT
E 300
E 300 4MATIC
E 300 BlueTEC
E 300 BlueTEC HYBRID
E 350
E 350 4MATIC
E 350 BlueTEC
E 350 BlueTEC 4MATIC
E 400
E 400 4MATIC
E 500
E 500 4MATIC
E 63 AMG
E 63 AMG 4MATIC
E 63 S AMG 4MATIC
2.2 TDi
2.2 TDi AT
2.3t
3.0 TiD

Reviews

Neofiliac score64%73%22%
Pros
  • Good M278 engine
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Torquey yet robust M157 in the E63 AMG
  • Arguably improved build quality
  • Better exterior styling than the pre-facelift
  • Rather elegant and coherent
Cons
  • Markedly uglier than the C219 CLS
  • AWD nonsense
  • Small diesel nonsense
  • MacPherson strut front suspension
  • AMG went 4MATIC
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • Stuck with basic suspension design
  • No obvious exterior change

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.