Compare Mercedes CLA C117 facelift vs Ford Focus 2 Sedan vs Ford Taurus 5

Variants
CLA 45 AMG
CLA 180
CLA 180 DCT
CLA 180d
CLA 180d DCT
CLA 200
CLA 200 DCT
CLA 200d
CLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 200d DCT
CLA 220 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d DCT
CLA 250
CLA 250 4MATIC DCT
CLA 250 DCT
1.4
1.6 100hp AT
1.6 100hp
1.6 115hp
1.6D 90hp
1.6D 109hp
1.8 125hp
1.8D
2.0 AT
2.0
2.0D
FWD
AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft
600 L / 21.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
76.0 L / 20.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/55 R18
Turning Circle
12.5 m / 41.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Coupe
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1432 mm / 56.4 in
1497 mm / 58.9 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4640 mm / 182.7 in
4488 mm / 176.7 in
5126 mm / 201.8 in
Size | Width
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1840 mm / 72.4 in
1892 mm / 74.5 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
1636.0 mm / 64.4 in
Wheel Size
15 in
18 in
Wheelbase
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.3

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Power
263.0 hp / 196.1 kW @ 6250 rpm
Engine | Redline
6700 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
75.2 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
338 Nm / 249.3 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2018
2007 ~ 2009

Reviews

Neofiliac score
22%
18%
21%
Pros
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Moved up in size class compared to Gen4
  • Comfortable ride
Cons
  • Small engines
  • Ugly hunchback styling
  • Build quality concerns
  • FWD platform
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with basic suspension setup
  • Uninspiring exterior and interior
  • Poor handling
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.