Compare Mercedes CLA C117 facelift vs Ford Five Hundred vs Ford Taurus 4
Variants
CLA 45 AMG
CLA 180
CLA 180 DCT
CLA 180d
CLA 180d DCT
CLA 200
CLA 200 DCT
CLA 200d
CLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 200d DCT
CLA 220 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d DCT
CLA 250
CLA 250 4MATIC DCT
CLA 250 DCT
AWD
FWD
3.0 155hp
3.0 200hp
3.0 201hp
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft
595 L / 21.0 cu-ft
481 L / 17.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R17
215/60 R16
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Coupe
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1432 mm / 56.4 in
1530 mm / 60.2 in
1425 mm / 56.1 in
Size | Length
4640 mm / 182.7 in
5100 mm / 200.8 in
5019 mm / 197.6 in
Size | Width
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1875 mm / 73.8 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1640.0 mm / 64.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1650.0 mm / 65.0 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Wheel Size
6J x 17
16 in
Wheelbase
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
2756 mm / 108.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Top Speed
200.0 km/h / 124.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 181.6 cu-in / 2976.0 cc
Engine | Power
203.0 hp / 151.4 kW @ 5750 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
68.2 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
Engine | Torque
271 Nm / 199.9 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Aisin F21
Automatic
Production
Availability
2016 ~ 2018
2004 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
22%
12%
13%
Pros
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Lots of space inside
- Clean exterior styling
Cons
- Small engines
- Ugly hunchback styling
- Build quality concerns
- FWD platform
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Uninspiring drive
- No powerful engine options
- Lethargic transmission
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.