Compare BMW Z3 Coupe vs Alfa Romeo 4C vs Alfa Romeo Brera
Variants
2.8
2.8 AT
3.0i
3.0i AT
Euro 5
Euro 6
1.75 TBi
2.0 JTDm
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS AT
2.4 JTDm 200
2.4 JTDm AT
2.4 JTDm 210
3.2 JTS Q4 AT
3.2 JTS
3.2 JTS Q4
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft ~ 610 L / 21.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.6 L / 11.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
2
4
Payload
270 kg / 595 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
3-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1183 mm / 46.6 in
Size | Length
4025 mm / 158.5 in
3989 mm / 157.0 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1639.0 mm / 64.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
Wheel Size
7.5 J x 17
Wheelbase
2380 mm / 93.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.5 sec
CO2 Emission
157 g/km
Top Speed
258.0 km/h / 160.3 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Mid-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.2:1
Engine | Displacement
1.7 L / 106.3 cu-in / 1742.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 2200-4250 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
78%
56%
Pros
- Iconic styling, even if ugly to some
- Reliable and simple drivetrain
- Good handling
- Very light
- Superbly balanced
- Good suspension setup
- Sweet little engine
- Much more affordable than the 8C
- Gorgeous styling
- Characterful engine lineup (more modern than the GT)
- Good handling characteristics
- Good suspension setup
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Very little cargo space
- Unreliable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.