Compare BMW Z3 Coupe vs Alfa Romeo GT vs Alfa Romeo 4C

Variants
2.8
2.8 AT
3.0i
3.0i AT
1.8 TwinSpark
1.9 JTDm 150
2.0 JTS
2.0 JTS Selespeed
3.2
Euro 5
Euro 6

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
320 L / 11.3 cu-ft ~ 905 L / 32.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.2 L / 7.6 qt
10.6 L / 11.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.8 L / 6.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
40.0 L / 10.6 gal
Passengers
2
4
2
Payload
270 kg / 595 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1183 mm / 46.6 in
Size | Length
4025 mm / 158.5 in
3989 mm / 157.0 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1639.0 mm / 64.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1604.0 mm / 63.1 in
Wheelbase
2596 mm / 102.2 in
2380 mm / 93.7 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.5 sec
CO2 Emission
157 g/km
Top Speed
258.0 km/h / 160.3 mph
Towing Capacity
1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Mid-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.2:1
Engine | Displacement
1.7 L / 106.3 cu-in / 1742.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Torque
350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 2200-4250 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual

Production

Availability
2003 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
67%
38%
78%
Pros
  • Iconic styling, even if ugly to some
  • Reliable and simple drivetrain
  • Good handling
  • Very light
  • Beautiful styling
  • Characterful Twin Spark engine
  • Superbly balanced
  • Good suspension setup
  • Sweet little engine
  • Much more affordable than the 8C
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable reliability
  • No powerful engine options
  • Very little cargo space

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.