Compare Audi R8 42 facelift vs Audi A5 B9 facelift vs Audi S5 F5

Variants
4.2 FSI
4.2 FSI DCT
5.2 FSI
5.2 FSI DCT
5.2 FSI V10 plus
5.2 FSI V10 plus DCT
35 TDI
35 TFSI
35 TFSI MT
40 TDI 190
40 TDI 204
40 TDI 204 quattro
40 TDI quattro
40 TFSI 190
40 TFSI 204
40 TFSI 204 quattro
45 TDI quattro AT
45 TFSI 245 quattro
45 TFSI 265 quattro
50 TDI quattro AT
3.0 TDI
3.0 TFSI

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
100 L / 3.5 cu-ft
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.0 L / 10.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
300 kg / 661 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/35 R19, 295/30 R19
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1252 mm / 49.3 in
1371 mm / 54.0 in
1368 mm / 53.9 in
Size | Length
4440 mm / 174.8 in
4697 mm / 184.9 in
Size | Width
1846 mm / 72.7 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1846 mm / 72.7 in | 2029 mm / 79.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1638.0 mm / 64.5 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2764 mm / 108.8 in
2765 mm / 108.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
89%
57%
60%
Pros
  • Improved V10 engine
  • New DCT transmission
  • Good handling
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Decent performance
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Lots of power
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • More balanced than Mk1
Cons
  • Very little cargo space
  • Questionable reliability
  • Bland styling
  • Ugly, over-styled body
  • Questionable drivetrain reliability
  • Too much tech nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.