Compare Audi R8 42 facelift vs Toyota 86 vs Toyota Camry Solara 2

Variants
4.2 FSI
4.2 FSI DCT
5.2 FSI
5.2 FSI DCT
5.2 FSI V10 plus
5.2 FSI V10 plus DCT
86 AT
86
GT86
GT86 AT
2.4
2.4 5AT
2.4 4AT
3.3 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
100 L / 3.5 cu-ft
391 L / 13.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
5
Payload
300 kg / 661 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/35 R19, 295/30 R19
215/45 R17
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
124 mm / 4.9 in
Size | Height
1252 mm / 49.3 in
1285 mm / 50.6 in
1425 mm / 56.1 in
Size | Length
4440 mm / 174.8 in
4890 mm / 192.5 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1816 mm / 71.5 in
Track Width | Front
1638.0 mm / 64.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5 J
Engine
FA20
Engine | Bore
84.5 mm / 3.3 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.8 mm / 3.7 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
89%
74%
47%
Pros
  • Improved V10 engine
  • New DCT transmission
  • Good handling
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Great build quality
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Superb drivetrain reliability
  • Sleek styling
Cons
  • Very little cargo space
  • Only available with small engines
  • Low cargo capacity
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.