Compare Aston Martin Vanquish 2 vs Maserati Coupe vs Maserati GranTurismo
Variants
Vanquish 6AT
Vanquish 8AT
Vanquish S 8AT
Coupe
GranSport
GranTurismo
GranTurismo MC Stradale
GranTurismo S
GranTurismo Sport
GranTurismo Sport AMT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
315 L / 11.1 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
78.0 L / 20.6 gal
88.0 L / 23.2 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
370 kg / 816 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 398 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 360 mm
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
Front wheel tires: 255/35 ZR20 Rear wheel tires: 305/30 ZR20
245/40 R19, 285/35 R19
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Length
4523 mm / 178.1 in
Size | Width
1822 mm / 71.7 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1538.0 mm / 60.6 in
Weight
1739.0 kg / 3833.8 lbs
Wheel Size
8J x 19, 9.5J x 19
8.5J x 19, 10.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2740 mm / 107.9 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
2942 mm / 115.8 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.0 m / 108.2 ft
Fuel Economy
15.9 L/100km / 14.8 MPG (combined) | 25.0 L/100km / 9.4 MPG (urban) | 11.0 L/100km / 21.4 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine
AM29
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
5.9 L / 362.2 cu-in / 5935.0 cc
4.2 L / 259.0 cu-in / 4244.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7200 rpm
Engine | Stroke
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
Engine | Torque
451 Nm / 332.6 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Reviews
Neofiliac score
86%
82%
93%
Pros
- Last chance to get AM's characterful V12 engine
- Improved reliability
- Good interior design
- Elegant Maserati styling
- Superb V8 engine
- Great double-wishbone suspension setup
- Sexy styling
- Superb engine characteristics
- Great handling
- Fine interior
Cons
- Less coherent styling
- Only automatic transmission
- Very high fuel consumption
- Low cargo capacity
- Horrible automated manual transmission
- Very high fuel consumption
- Some ergonomics issues
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.