Compare Aston Martin DBS V12 vs Bentley Continental GT
Variants
MT
AT
Continental GT
Continental GT Speed
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
19.0 L / 20.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
12.5 L / 13.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
78.0 L / 20.6 gal
90.0 L / 23.8 gal
Passengers
2
4
Payload
415 kg / 915 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/35 R20, 295/30 R20
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Height
1280 mm / 50.4 in
Size | Length
4721 mm / 185.9 in
Size | Width
1905 mm / 75.0 in | 2060 mm / 81.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Weight
1695.0 kg / 3736.8 lbs
Wheelbase
2740 mm / 107.9 in
2745 mm / 108.1 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.1 sec
CO2 Emission
388 g/km
Fuel Economy
16.4 L/100km / 14.3 MPG (combined) | 24.3 L/100km / 9.7 MPG (urban) | 11.7 L/100km / 20.1 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
307.0 km/h / 190.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.9:1
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
5.9 L / 362.2 cu-in / 5935.0 cc
6.0 L / 366.0 cu-in / 5998.0 cc
Engine | Power
517.0 hp / 385.5 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
87.1 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
90.2 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
570 Nm / 420.4 lb-ft @ 5750 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated petrol V12 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged multi-port injected petrol W12 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
92%
76%
Pros
- The ultimate Aston Martin styling
- Characterful V12 engine
- Manual transmission
- Superb power and torque
- Good interiors
- Lots of customizable options
Cons
- Not very reliable
- Very high fuel consumption
- Extremely unreliable
- Very high fuel consumption
- Design did not age well
- Bad handling dynamics
- AWD nonsense
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.