Compare Nissan 350Z vs Toyota 86 vs Toyota Supra 4

Variants
283
300 AT
313
313 AT
300
86 AT
86
GT86
GT86 AT
2JZ-GE
2JZ-GE AT
2JZ-GTE
2JZ-GTE AT
2JZ-GTE JDM
2JZ-GTE JDM AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
235 L / 8.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.9 L / 8.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
2
4
4
Payload
220 kg / 485 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
215/45 R17
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
124 mm / 4.9 in
Size | Height
1285 mm / 50.6 in
1275 mm / 50.2 in
Size | Length
4520 mm / 178.0 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1810 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
5.1 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.8 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5 J
Euro 5
Engine
FA20
Engine | Bore
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.5 cu-in / 3498.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
3.0 L / 182.9 cu-in / 2997.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
1993 ~ 2002

Reviews

Neofiliac score
65%
74%
88%
Pros
  • Good drivetrain setup
  • Good handling characteristics
  • Good exterior styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Great build quality
  • Superb 2JZ engine family
  • Absolutely reliable
  • Great suspension setup
  • Iconic styling
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Poor interior finish
  • Only available with small engines
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Many poorly tuned examples out there

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.