HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Nissan 200SX S15 vs Subaru BRZ vs Nissan 370Z

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
MT
AT
370Z
370Z 2018
370Z AT
370Z AT 2018
370Z NISMO
370Z NISMO AT
370Z NISMO EU

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
240 L / 8.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.2 L / 7.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
4.9 L / 5.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
4
4
2

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
11.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.0 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
115 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1285 mm / 50.6 in
Size | Length
4445 mm / 175.0 in
4240 mm / 166.9 in
Size | Width
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1480.0 mm / 58.3 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2525 mm / 99.4 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.30
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 5
Engine
FA20D
VQ37VHR
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
95.5 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
200.0 hp / 149.1 kW @ 7000 rpm
Engine | Redline
7500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
100.1 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
205 Nm / 151.2 lb-ft @ 6400-6600 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
1999 ~ 2002
2012 ~ 2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
72%
74%
81%
Pros
  • Good overall styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable drivetrain
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low center of gravity
  • Good balance
  • Good handling characteristics
  • Up to enjoyable 7500rpm redline
  • Some reliability concerns
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Less handsome than the S14
  • Down on engine power
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.