Compare Hyundai Coupe 2 vs Subaru BRZ vs Hyundai Coupe 2

Variants
1.6
2.0 136
2.0 136 AT
2.0 143
2.0 143 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
MT
AT
1.6
2.0 136
2.0 136 AT
2.0 143
2.0 143 AT
2.7
2.7 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
420 L / 14.8 cu-ft
420 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.2 L / 7.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height
1330 mm / 52.4 in
1330 mm / 52.4 in
Size | Length
4395 mm / 173.0 in
4240 mm / 166.9 in
4395 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1490.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheel Size
7J x 16 H2
7J x 16 H2
Wheelbase
2530 mm / 99.6 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2530 mm / 99.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6
Euro 4
Engine
FA20D
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
200.0 hp / 149.1 kW @ 7000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
100.1 hp/L / 1.6 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
205 Nm / 151.2 lb-ft @ 6400-6600 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
22%
74%
22%
Pros
  • Decent suspension setup
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low center of gravity
  • Good balance
  • Decent suspension setup
Cons
  • Bland styling
  • No powerful engine options
  • Not very well built
  • Down on engine power
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Bland styling
  • No powerful engine options
  • Not very well built

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.