Compare Volkswagen Scirocco 3 vs Audi A1 facelift vs Audi A1

Variants
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 160
1.4 TSI 160 DSG
2.0 TDI 140
2.0 TDI 140 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 170
2.0 TDI 170 DSG
2.0 TDI 177
2.0 TDI 177 DSG
2.0 TDI 184
2.0 TDI 184 DSG
2.0 TSI 180
2.0 TSI 180 DSG
2.0 TSI 200
2.0 TSI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 210
2.0 TSI 210 DSG
2.0 TSI GTS
2.0 TSI GTS DSG
Scirocco R 265
Scirocco R 265 DSG
Scirocco R 280
Scirocco R 280 DSG
1.0 TFSI
1.0 TFSI ultra
1.0 TFSI ultra DCT
1.4 TDI ultra
1.4 TDI ultra DCT
1.4 TFSI 125
1.4 TFSI 125 DCT
1.4 TFSI 150
1.4 TFSI 150 DCT
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI DCT
1.8 TFSI DCT
1.2 TFSI
1.4 TFSI 122
1.4 TFSI 122 DCT
1.4 TFSI 140
1.4 TFSI 140 DCT
1.4 TFSI 185 DCT
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 90
1.6 TDI 90 DCT
2.0 TDI

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
4
5
5
Payload
375 kg / 827 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Coupe
3-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1416 mm / 55.7 in
1416 mm / 55.7 in
Size | Length
3973 mm / 156.4 in
3954 mm / 155.7 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
Wheelbase
2578 mm / 101.5 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in
2469 mm / 97.2 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 5

Reviews

Neofiliac score
51%
21%
22%
Pros
  • Good styling for a hatchback
  • Reasonably good handling
  • Lots of power in the Scirocco R
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Better looking than the Sportback
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Some reliability concerns
  • No powerful engine options
  • Even smaller engines than pre-facelift
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.