Compare Maserati Coupe vs Aston Martin DB9 vs Maserati GranTurismo
Variants
Coupe
GranSport
DB9
DB9 AT
DB9 2013
DB9 GT
GranTurismo
GranTurismo MC Stradale
GranTurismo S
GranTurismo Sport
GranTurismo Sport AMT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
315 L / 11.1 cu-ft
175 L / 6.2 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
10.4 L / 11.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
88.0 L / 23.2 gal
Passengers
4
4
Payload
370 kg / 816 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
245/40 R19, 285/35 R19
Construction
Body Style
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
2-door Coupe
Dimensions
Size | Length
4523 mm / 178.1 in
Size | Width
1822 mm / 71.7 in
Track Width | Front
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1538.0 mm / 60.6 in
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
Wheel Size
8J x 19, 9.5J x 19
8.5J x 19, 10.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2660 mm / 104.7 in
2942 mm / 115.8 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
33.0 m / 108.2 ft
CO2 Emission
333 g/km
Fuel Economy
15.9 L/100km / 14.8 MPG (combined) | 25.0 L/100km / 9.4 MPG (urban) | 11.0 L/100km / 21.4 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
4.2 L / 259.0 cu-in / 4244.0 cc
5.9 L / 362.2 cu-in / 5935.0 cc
Engine | Redline
7200 rpm
Engine | Stroke
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
Engine | Torque
451 Nm / 332.6 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual
Reviews
Neofiliac score
82%
87%
93%
Pros
- Elegant Maserati styling
- Superb V8 engine
- Great double-wishbone suspension setup
- Great styling
- New, elegant interior
- Characterful V12 engine
- Available with manual transmission
- Sexy styling
- Superb engine characteristics
- Great handling
- Fine interior
Cons
- Very high fuel consumption
- Low cargo capacity
- Horrible automated manual transmission
- Unreliable engine
- Very high fuel consumption
- Very little cargo space
- Very high fuel consumption
- Some ergonomics issues
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.