Compare SEAT Leon III SC vs Seat Leon 3 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser

Variants
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 TGI 110
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 105 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 90
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TSI 265 DSG Cupra
2.0 TSI 265 Cupra
2.0 TSI 280 DSG Cupra
2.0 TSI 280 Cupra
2.0 TSI 290 Cupra
2.0 TSI 290 DSG Cupra
1.4 TSI 125 FR
1.4 TSI 150 FR
1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR
1.8 TSI 180 DSG FR
1.8 TSI 180 FR
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 DSG FR
2.0 TDI 150 DSG FR
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 FR
2.0 TDI 150 FR
2.0 TDI 184 Euro6 DSG FR
2.0 TDI 184 FR
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 86
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 TGI 110
1.4 TGI 110 CNG
1.4 TGI 110 CNG DSG
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.5 TGI 130
1.5 TGI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 105 DSG
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 115 DSG
1.6 TDI 90
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 DSG
2.0 TDI 184
2.0 TDI 184 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 265
Cupra 2.0 TSI 265 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 280
Cupra 2.0 TSI 280 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 290
Cupra 2.0 TSI 290 DSG
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300
Cupra 2.0 TSI 300 DSG
Cupra R 2.0 TSI 310
1.6
2.0 141PS
2.0 141PS AT
2.0 150PS
2.0 150PS AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 121PS
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4T 182PS
2.4T 182PS AT
2.4T 220PS
2.4T 220PS AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent

Construction

Body Style
3-door Coupe
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
144 mm / 5.7 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
24%
2%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Looks fine from some angles
  • So ugly that it's an icon
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Not independent rear suspensions
  • Truly epitomizes ugliness

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.