HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare SEAT Leon III SC vs SEAT Leon 4 vs Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift

Variants
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 105 DSG
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DSG
1.2 TSI 86
1.4 TGI 110
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125
1.4 TSI 140
1.4 TSI 150
1.4 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 105 DSG
1.6 TDI 105
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 90
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TSI 265 DSG Cupra
2.0 TSI 265 Cupra
2.0 TSI 280 DSG Cupra
2.0 TSI 280 Cupra
2.0 TSI 290 Cupra
2.0 TSI 290 DSG Cupra
1.4 TSI 125 FR
1.4 TSI 150 FR
1.4 TSI 150 DSG FR
1.8 TSI 180 DSG FR
1.8 TSI 180 FR
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 DSG FR
2.0 TDI 150 DSG FR
2.0 TDI 150 Euro6 FR
2.0 TDI 150 FR
2.0 TDI 184 Euro6 DSG FR
2.0 TDI 184 FR
1.0 eTSI DSG
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 90
1.4 e-HYBRID DSG
1.5 eTSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
2.0 TDI 115
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TSI DSG
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 DPi
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 345 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
11.7 m / 38.2 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
12.8 kWh (gross)
Body Style
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
144 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Length
4368 mm / 172.0 in
4340 mm / 170.9 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2650 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
Electric Range
58.0 km / 36.0 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
27%
17%
32%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Less ugly than before
  • Decent build quality
  • Decent performance
  • Good handling
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poorly built
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.