Compare Volvo C30 vs Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL) vs Mazda 2 / Demio III (DJ)

Volvo C30

Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL)

Mazda 2 / Demio III (DJ)

Volvo C30Mazda 3 / Axela II (BL)Mazda 2 / Demio III (DJ)
Variants
1.6 Euro5
1.6D
D2
1.6
1.8
1.8F
D3
D3 AT
D4
D4 AT
2.0
2.0D
2.0F
D5 AT
2.4i
2.4i AT
T5 220
T5 220 AT
T5 230
T5 230 AT
1.6 CD 109
1.6 CD 115
1.6 105
1.6 105 AT
2.0 CD 150
2.0 DISI 150
2.0 150 AT
2.2 CD 185
2.5 167
2.5 167 AT
MPS / Mazdaspeed3
1.5 SkyActiv-D
1.5 SkyActiv-G 115
1.5 SkyActiv-G 75
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score58%47%26%
Pros
  • Great styling
  • Interesting I5 engines
  • Good reliability record
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Rather beautifully styled
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Small turning circle
  • Strong engine lineup
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.