Compare Toyota Land Cruiser J200 vs Ford Explorer 4 vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado J120
Variants
4.5D AT
4.5D Euro5 AT
4.6 309 AT
4.6 318 AT
4.7 AT
5.7 6AT
5.7 8AT
4.0 212
4.0 208
4.0 208 4WD
4.0 212 4WD
4.6
4.6 4WD
2.7 AWD 5-door
2.7 AWD 3-door
3.0D 163 5-door
3.0D 163 3-door
3.0D 163 AT 5-door
3.0D 163 AT 3-door
3.0D 173 3-door
3.0D 173 5-door
4.0 AT 5-door
4.0 3-door
4.0 4AT 5-door
4.0 5AT 5-door
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
87.0 L / 23.0 gal
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Breakover Angle
21.0 deg
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Solid-axle
Solid axle
Water Fording
700 mm / 27.6 in
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
226 mm / 8.9 in
Track Width | Front
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheel Size
17 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
98%
53%
63%
Pros
- Highest reliability record
- The best offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Superb fit and finish
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Great offroad capabilities
- Good drivetrain reliability
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High fuel consumption
- Slow and sluggish
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- Bland styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.