Compare Toyota Highlander 2 vs Toyota Harrier 3 vs Toyota Highlander 2
Variants
2.7 AT
3.3 Hybrid AWD
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0T AWD AT
2.0T AT
2.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
2.7 AT
3.3 Hybrid AWD
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
292 L / 10.3 cu-ft ~ 2282 L / 80.6 cu-ft
292 L / 10.3 cu-ft ~ 2282 L / 80.6 cu-ft
Passengers
7
5
7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
206 mm / 8.1 in
206 mm / 8.1 in
Size | Height
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1690 mm / 66.5 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Size | Length
4785 mm / 188.4 in
4785 mm / 188.4 in
Size | Width
1910 mm / 75.2 in
1835 mm / 72.2 in
1910 mm / 75.2 in
Track Width | Front
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Wheelbase
2790 mm / 109.8 in
2660 mm / 104.7 in
2790 mm / 109.8 in
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
63%
42%
63%
Pros
- Improved styling
- Sufficiently powerful engines
- High cargo capacity
- Superb reliability record
- Low fuel consumption
- Good build quality
- Improved styling
- Sufficiently powerful engines
- High cargo capacity
- Superb reliability record
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Small engines
- Slow and sluggish
- Slow and sluggish
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.