Compare Toyota RAV4 IV vs Peugeot 4007 vs Peugeot 508 RXH
Variants
2.0 151 AWD
2.0 151 AWD CVT
2.0 151 Euro6 AWD
2.0 151 Euro6 AWD CVT
2.0D 124
2.0D 124 AWD
2.0D 143
2.2D AWD
2.2D AWD AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AWD AT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD
2.2D
2.2D AT
2.4
2.0 BlueHDi AT
2.0 HDi Hybrid AT
2.0 HDi Hybrid AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
510 L / 18.0 cu-ft ~ 1686 L / 59.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.5 L / 5.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
620 kg / 1367 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.6 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
19.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
184 mm / 7.2 in
Size | Height
1715 mm / 67.5 in
Size | Length
4636 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1805 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1592.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1564.0 mm / 61.6 in
Weight
1790.0 kg / 3946.3 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2815 mm / 110.8 in
Performance
Electric Range
5.0 km / 3.1 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
2.4 l 16V 125 kW
DW10CTED4
Engine | Bore
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
88.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
45%
34%
25%
Pros
- Good fuel economy
- High reliaiblity
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Fully independent suspension setup
- Not very ugly
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Ugly front-end
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Uglier than the standard 508 SW
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.