Compare Toyota Harrier 3 vs Toyota C-HR vs Toyota Harrier 4
Variants
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0T AWD AT
2.0T AT
2.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Departure Angle
38.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/50 R18
225/55 R19
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Dimensions
Size | Height
1690 mm / 66.5 in
1660 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4740 mm / 186.6 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in
1855 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Wheel Size
18 in
19 in
Wheelbase
2660 mm / 104.7 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Compression Ratio
12.5:1
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
28%
29%
Pros
- Low fuel consumption
- Good build quality
- Decent exterior styling
- Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
- Small turning circle
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Small engines
- Slow and sluggish
- Slow and sluggish
- Miserably low engine output
- Just a clumsy hatchback
- No powerful engine options
- Crossover nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.