Compare Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60) vs Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50) vs Toyota Venza (AV10)

Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60)

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)

Toyota Venza (AV10)

Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60)Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)Toyota Venza (AV10)
Variants
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0T AWD AT
2.0T AT
2.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
2.7 AWD
2.7 AWD AT
3.5
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD
3.5 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score42%28%24%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good build quality
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
  • Small turning circle
  • Rather good exterior design (for what it is)
  • Exceptionally reliable powertrain
  • Great fit and finish
Cons
  • Small engines
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Just a clumsy hatchback
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Half crossover, half station wagon

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.