Compare Toyota FJ Cruiser vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado J120 vs Kia Sorento

Variants
MT
AT
2.7 AWD 5-door
2.7 AWD 3-door
3.0D 163 5-door
3.0D 163 3-door
3.0D 163 AT 5-door
3.0D 163 AT 3-door
3.0D 173 3-door
3.0D 173 5-door
4.0 AT 5-door
4.0 3-door
4.0 4AT 5-door
4.0 5AT 5-door
2.4 AWD
2.5 CRDi AWD
2.5 CRDi AWD AT
2.5 DCR AWD
2.5 DCR AWD AT
3.3 AWD AT
3.5 AWD AT
3.8 4WD
3.8 AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
9.8 L / 10.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.1 L / 6.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
87.0 L / 23.0 gal
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Solid axle
Solid axle
Tire Size
265/70 R17
Turning Circle
12.8 m / 42.0 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
208 mm / 8.2 in
Size | Height
1829 mm / 72.0 in
Size | Length
4671 mm / 183.9 in
Size | Width
1894 mm / 74.6 in
Track Width | Front
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Wheel Size
17 in
17 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2710 mm / 106.7 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.8 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.4 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.425
Fuel Economy
14.7 L/100km / 16.0 MPG (urban) | 12.4 L/100km / 19.0 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine
1GR-FE
Engine | Displacement
4.0 L / 244.1 cu-in / 4000.0 cc
Engine | Power
239.0 hp / 178.2 kW @ 5200 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
59.8 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
278 Nm / 205.0 lb-ft @ 3700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
83%
63%
22%
Pros
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • Interesting retro styling
  • Superb build quality
  • Very reliable
  • Great offroad capabilities
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Not much
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Slow and sluggish
  • No powerful engine options
  • Bland styling
  • Ugly exterior
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Poor offroad capabilities for an SUV
  • High 0.42 drag coefficient
  • Poor quality

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.