Compare Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50) vs Toyota RAV4 IV (XA40) vs Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)

Toyota RAV4 IV (XA40)

Toyota C-HR facelift

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)Toyota RAV4 IV (XA40)Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
2.0 151 AWD
2.0 151 AWD CVT
2.0 151 Euro6 AWD
2.0 151 Euro6 AWD CVT
2.0D 124
2.0D 124 AWD
2.0D 143
2.2D AWD
2.2D AWD AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AWD AT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid

Reviews

Neofiliac score28%45%42%
Pros
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
  • Small turning circle
  • Good fuel economy
  • High reliaiblity
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Just a clumsy hatchback
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Ugly front-end
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.