Compare Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50) vs Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60) vs Toyota Highlander / Kluger 2 (XU40)

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)

Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60)

Toyota Highlander / Kluger 2 (XU40)

Toyota C-HR (AX10/AX50)Toyota Harrier 3 (XU60)Toyota Highlander / Kluger 2 (XU40)
Variants
1.2
1.2 4WD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 AT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0T AWD AT
2.0T AT
2.5 Hybrid AWD CVT
2.7 AT
3.3 Hybrid AWD
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD AT
3.5 Hybrid AWD

Reviews

Neofiliac score28%42%63%
Pros
  • Decent exterior styling
  • Low official fuel consumption (hybrid)
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good build quality
  • Improved styling
  • Sufficiently powerful engines
  • High cargo capacity
  • Superb reliability record
Cons
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Just a clumsy hatchback
  • Small engines
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Slow and sluggish

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.