Compare Mercedes GLC-Class X253 vs Mercedes GLA-Class X156 facelift vs Mercedes GLK-Class X204
Variants
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT
GLA 180
GLA 180 DCT
GLA 180d
GLA 180d DCT
GLA 200
GLA 200 DCT
GLA 200d
GLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 200d DCT
GLA 220 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220 DCT
GLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
GLA 220d DCT
GLA 250
GLA 250 4MATIC DCT
GLA 250 DCT
GLA 45 AMG 4MATIC DCT
GLK 200
GLK 200 CDI
GLK 200 CDI AT
GLK 220 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 220 CDI
GLK 220 CDI AT
GLK 250 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 250 4MATIC AT
GLK 280 4MATIC AT
GLK 320 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 CDI Euro5 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 4MATIC AT
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.9 deg
23.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.1 deg
19.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
35.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.5 deg
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.8 ft
Water Fording
300 mm / 11.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
123 mm / 4.8 in
Size | Height
1494 mm / 58.8 in
Size | Length
4424 mm / 174.2 in
Size | Width
1804 mm / 71.0 in | 2022 mm / 79.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1569.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheelbase
2873 mm / 113.1 in
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2755 mm / 108.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
60%
36%
45%
Pros
- Great V8 in the 63AMG models
- Cleaner exterior styling
- Low official fuel consumption
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.9L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent exterior styling
- Some offroad capabilities
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Most engines are lethargic
- Fuel-cell not widely available
- Falsely sold as SUV
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Lethargic drivetrain
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.