Compare Kia Sportage 3 vs Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Kia Sportage 5
Variants
1.6
1.7D 116
2.0 163
2.0 163 AT
2.0D 136
2.0D 136 AWD AT
2.0D 136 AT
2.0D 184
2.0D 184 AWD
2.0D 184 AWD AT
2.0D 184 AT
2.0 GDI
2.0 GDI AWD
2.0 GDI AWD AT
2.0 GDI AT
2.4 176 AWD AT
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
1.6 CRDi 116 MT
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 150 AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDi 150 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 150 MT
1.6 T-GDi 180 AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDi 180 DCT
1.6 T-GDi Hybrid
1.6 T-GDi Hybrid AWD
1.6 T-GDi PHEV AWD
2.0 CRDi AT
2.0 CRDi AWD AT
2.0 MPI AT
2.0 MPI MT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 GDI AWD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
601 L / 21.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Chassis Type
Unibody
Offroad | Approach Angle
22.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
17.7 deg
20.7 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.2 deg
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.7 ft
11.6 m / 38.1 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
15.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Body Style
5-door SUV
Compact crossover
Platform
Hyundai-Kia N3
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
172 mm / 6.8 in
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1648 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4440 mm / 174.8 in
4395 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
1855 mm / 73.0 in
1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1615.0 mm / 63.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheelbase
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.37
Electric Range
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6d
Engine
Theta II
G4KIII
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
97.0 mm / 3.8 in
Production
Availability
2020
Debut
2021-06-08
Made In
South Korea
Reviews
Neofiliac score
26%
35%
32%
Pros
- Marginal offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Decent interior
- High cargo capacity
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- High 0.37 drag coefficient
- Remains ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Low build quality
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly
- Crossover nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.