Compare Kia Sportage 3 vs Kia Sportage 5 vs Audi Q5 II facelift

Kia Sportage 3 (SL) Crossover (2010-2016)

Audi Q5 II (FY/80A) facelift Crossover (2020)

Kia | Cars

Audi | Cars

Variants

1.6

1.7D 116

2.0 163

2.0 163 AT

2.0D 136

2.0D 136 AWD AT

2.0D 136 AT

2.0D 184

2.0D 184 AWD

2.0D 184 AWD AT

2.0D 184 AT

2.0 GDI

2.0 GDI AWD

2.0 GDI AWD AT

2.0 GDI AT

2.4 176 AWD AT

1.6 CRDi 116 MT

1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT

1.6 CRDi 136 DCT

1.6 T-GDi 150 AWD DCT

1.6 T-GDi 150 DCT

1.6 T-GDi 150 MT

1.6 T-GDi 180 AWD DCT

1.6 T-GDi 180 DCT

1.6 T-GDi Hybrid

1.6 T-GDi Hybrid AWD

1.6 T-GDi PHEV AWD

2.0 CRDi AT

2.0 CRDi AWD AT

2.0 MPI AT

2.0 MPI MT

2.5 GDI AT

2.5 GDI AWD AT

35 TDI DCT

40 TDI quattro ultra DCT

40 TFSI quattro DCT

45 TFSI quattro ultra DCT

50 TDI quattro AT

50 TFSI e quattro DCT

55 TFSI e quattro DCT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

6.7 L / 7.1 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

4.6 L / 4.9 qt

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Ventilated discs

Chassis Type

Unibody

Offroad | Breakover Angle

17.7 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

28.2 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Multi-link

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Turning Circle

10.6 m / 34.7 ft

11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

17.9 kWh (gross) | 14.4 kWh (net)

Battery | Type

Lithium-polymer

Lithium-ion

Battery | Voltage

381.0 V

Body Style

5-door SUV

Compact crossover

Platform

Hyundai-Kia N3

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

172 mm / 6.8 in

Size | Length

4440 mm / 174.8 in

4682 mm / 184.3 in

Size | Width

1855 mm / 73.0 in

1893 mm / 74.5 in | 2140 mm / 84.3 in (mirror unfolded)

Track Width | Front

1615.0 mm / 63.6 in

Wheelbase

2640 mm / 103.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.37

Electric Range

56.0 km / 34.8 mi

Powertrain

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Engine

Theta II

G4KIII

Engine | Stroke

97.0 mm / 3.8 in

Production

Debut

2021-06-08

Made In

South Korea

Reviews

Neofiliac score

26%

32%

56%

Pros

Marginal offroad capabilities

Decent interior
High cargo capacity

Some offroad capabilities
Low fuel consumption
Decent styling

Cons

Slow and sluggish
No powerful engine options
High 0.37 drag coefficient
Remains ugly

Poor performance
No powerful engine options
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Ugly
Crossover nonsense

Crossover nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.