Compare Kia Sportage 2 vs Chevrolet Trax vs Chevrolet Equinox 3
Variants
2.0
2.0 AWD
2.0 AWD AT
2.0D 113 AWD
2.0D 140
2.0D 150
2.0D 150 AT
2.7 AWD
2.7 AWD AT
1.4 AT
1.4 AWD AT
1.4 Turbo AWD
1.6
1.7D
1.7D AT
1.7D AWD
1.5
1.5 AWD
1.5
1.6d
1.6d AWD
2.0
2.0 AWD
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
58.0 L / 15.3 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
504 kg / 1111 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/70 R16
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
196 mm / 7.7 in
157 mm / 6.2 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2555 mm / 100.6 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.40
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 5
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
15%
23%
19%
Pros
- Not much
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Cheap to purchase
Cons
- Rather ugly
- Slow and sluggish
- No powerful engine options
- High 0.40 drag coefficient
- Somewhat ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Basic suspension setup
- Ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.