Compare Kia Sorento 3 vs Kia Soul vs Renault Captur

Variants
2.0 AWD AT
2.0 T-GDI AT
2.0 T-GDI AWD AT
2.2 CRDi
2.2 CRDi AT
2.2 CRDi AWD
2.2 CRDi AWD AT
2.4 GDI AT
2.4 GDi AWD
2.4 GDI AWD AT
3.3 GDI AT
3.3 GDI AWD AT
3.5 AWD AT
1.6
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi AT
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft ~ 570 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
410 kg / 904 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
16.9 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
21.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Tire Size
195/65R15
Turning Circle
10.5 m / 34.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
185 mm / 7.3 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1661 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4105 mm / 161.6 in
4122 mm / 162.3 in
Size | Width
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Weight
1270.0 kg / 2799.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 4
Engine
G4KH
Engine | Bore
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
79.2 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
46%
14%
1%
Pros
  • Small offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • New drivetrain options
  • Distinct styling
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Both ugly and forgettable

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.