Compare Kia Niro vs Kia Sorento 4 vs Kia Sportage 4

Kia Sportage 4 (QL) Crossover (2016-2021)

Kia | Cars

Variants

1.6 GDI Hybrid

1.6 GDI Euro6d Hybrid

1.6 GDI PHEV

1.6 GDI Euro6d PHEV

1.6 T-GDi Hybrid

1.6 T-GDi Hybrid AWD

1.6 T-GDI PHEV AWD

2.2 CRDi AWD DCT

2.2 CRDi DCT

2.5 GDI AT

2.5 GDI AWD AT

2.5 T-GDI AWD DCT

2.5 T-GDI DCT

1.6D 115

1.6D 136

1.6D 136 AWD

1.6D 136 AWD DCT

1.6 GDI

1.6 GDI Euro6d

1.6 T-GDI

1.6 T-GDI Euro6d

1.6 T-GDI AWD

1.6 T-GDI Euro6d AWD

1.6 T-GDI Euro6d AWD DCT

1.6 T-GDI AWD DCT

1.7D 115

2.0D 136

2.0D 136 AWD

2.0D 136 AWD AT

2.0D 185 AWD

2.0D 185 Euro6d AWD

2.0D 185 AWD AT

2.0 GDI 237 AWD AT

2.0 GDI 240 AT

2.0 MPI

2.0 MPI AT

2.0 MPI AWD

2.0 MPI AWD AT

2.0 T-GDI AWD AT

2.0 T-GDI AT

2.4 GDI AT

2.4 GDI AWD AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

6.0 L / 6.3 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

4.8 L / 5.1 qt

Passengers

5 / 6 / 7

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

16.8 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Double-wishbone

Double wishbone

Multi-link

Turning Circle

10.6 m / 34.8 ft

11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Type

Lithium-polymer

Battery | Voltage

360.0 V

Body Style

5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

160 mm / 6.3 in

Size | Length

4355 mm / 171.5 in

Wheelbase

2700 mm / 106.3 in

2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

CO2 Emission

36 g/km

Coefficient Of Drag

0.29

Electric Range

58.0 km / 36.0 mi

68.0 km / 42.3 mi

Towing Capacity

600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1300 kg / 2866 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine

G4LE

G4FT

Engine | Bore

72.0 mm / 2.8 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

13.0:1

Engine | Stroke

97.0 mm / 3.8 in

Engine | Torque

147 Nm / 108.4 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm + 170 Nm / 125.4 lb-ft @ 0-1798 rpm

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Transmission | Type

Double clutch transmission (DCT)

Production

Availability

2020 Q3

Debut

2020-03-18

Reviews

Neofiliac score

38%

48%

42%

Pros

Good exterior styling
Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low official fuel consumption

Decent styling
Some offroad capabilities
Low fuel consumption
High cargo capacity

Improved fuel efficiency
Marginal capabilities

Cons

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output

Crossover nonsense
Long-term drivetrain reliability concerns

Horrible 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.