Compare Ford Explorer 4 vs Ford Explorer 3 vs Ford Bronco Sport
Variants
4.0 212
4.0 208
4.0 208 4WD
4.0 212 4WD
4.6
4.6 4WD
4.0
4.6
4.6 4WD
5.4
5.4 AWD
1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Solid-axle
Solid axle
Independent, spring
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
Platform
Ford C2
Trim Levels
Base, Big Bend, Outer Banks, Badlands and First Edition
Dimensions
Size | Length
4387 mm / 172.7 in
Size | Width
1887 mm / 74.3 in | 2088 mm / 82.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1938 mm / 76.3 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheelbase
2890 mm / 113.8 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
2020
Debut
2020-07-13
Made In
Mexico
Reviews
Neofiliac score
53%
53%
39%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Some offroad capabilities
- Decent styling for a crossover
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Slow and sluggish
- Not the highest grade of build
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.