Compare Ford Explorer 3 vs Ford Expedition 2 vs Ford Explorer 4
Variants
4.0
4.6
4.6 4WD
5.4
5.4 AWD
4.6
4.6 4WD
5.4 263 4WD
5.4 263
5.4 304
5.4 304 4WD
4.0 212
4.0 208
4.0 208 4WD
4.0 212 4WD
4.6
4.6 4WD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
571 L / 20.2 cu-ft ~ 1723 L / 60.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
106.0 L / 28.0 gal
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
Passengers
5
8
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Solid axle
Solid-axle
Tire Size
265/70 R17
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1971 mm / 77.6 in
Size | Length
5228 mm / 205.8 in
Size | Width
2000 mm / 78.7 in
Track Width | Front
1702.0 mm / 67.0 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
1709.0 mm / 67.3 in
Wheelbase
2890 mm / 113.8 in
3023 mm / 119.0 in
Powertrain
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
53%
58%
53%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Stout drivetrain
- Considerable offroad capabilities
- Lots of space inside
- High cargo capacity
- Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
- Slow and sluggish
- Not the highest grade of build
- Poor fuel economy
- Sluggish acceleration
- Poor handling
- Bland styling
- Slow and sluggish
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.