Compare Jeep Cherokee KK vs Jeep Renegade facelift vs Fiat 500X facelift

Variants
2.8 CRD
3.7
1.0 T-GDI 120
1.3 T-GDI 180 4x4 AT
1.3 Turbo 150 DCT
1.3 Turbo 190 4xe AT
1.3 Turbo 240 4xe AT
1.6 Multijet 120
1.6 Multijet 120 DCT
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4 AT
2.0 Multijet 170 4x4 AT
2.4 MultiAir2 182 4x4 AT
2.4 MultiAir2 182 AT
1.0 FireFly Turbo 120
1.3 FireFly Turbo 150
1.3 MultiJet II 95
1.3 Turbo 177 AWD AT
1.6 e TorQ 110
1.6 MultiJet II 120
1.6 MultiJet II 120 DCT
2.0 MultiJet II 150 AWD AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft ~ 1404 L / 49.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.4 L / 6.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
540 kg / 1190 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
MacPherson strut
Semi-independent
Tire Size
235/65 R17, 235/60 R18
215/60 R17, 225/55 R18
Water Fording
400 mm / 15.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height
1797 mm / 70.7 in
Size | Length
4493 mm / 176.9 in
Size | Width
1839 mm / 72.4 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
Weight
1980.0 kg / 4365.2 lbs
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2694 mm / 106.1 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.5 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
10.0 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
Towing Capacity
907 kg / 2000 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6 d-TEMP
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2008 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
25%
11%
8%
Pros
  • Good offroad capabilities for a crossover
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • More a facelift than a new model
  • Very ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Short full-electric range
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts at all four corners
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Poor offroad capabilities for an SUV
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Ugliest Italian car widely available

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.