Compare Jeep Cherokee KK vs Jeep Compass 2 vs Peugeot 3008 II
Variants
2.8 CRD
3.7
1.3 130
1.3 150 DCT
1.3 190 4xe AT
1.3 240 4xe AT
1.4 MultiAir 140
1.4 MultiAir 170 4x4 AT
1.6 Multijet 120
1.6 Multijet 130
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4
2.0 Multijet 140 4x4 AT
2.0 Multijet 170 4x4 AT
1.2 130 AT
1.2 130
1.5 HDi 130 AT
1.5 HDi 130
1.6 HDi 100
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 180 AT
1.6 PHEV
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 HDi 150
GT 2.0 HDi 177
GT 2.0 HDi 180
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft ~ 1404 L / 49.6 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1482 L / 52.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
540 kg / 1190 lbs
540 kg / 1190 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
29.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
235/65 R17, 235/60 R18
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.3 ft
10.7 m / 35.0 ft
Water Fording
406 mm / 16.0 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.4 kWh (gross)
13.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
219 mm / 8.6 in
Size | Height
1797 mm / 70.7 in
Size | Length
4493 mm / 176.9 in
4447 mm / 175.1 in
Size | Width
1839 mm / 72.4 in
1841 mm / 72.5 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1906 mm / 75.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Weight
1980.0 kg / 4365.2 lbs
Wheelbase
2694 mm / 106.1 in
2636 mm / 103.8 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.5 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
10.0 sec
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2008 ~ 2012
2017
Debut
2016 LA International Auto Show
Made In
Mexico, Brazil, China, India, Italy
Reviews
Neofiliac score
25%
12%
21%
Pros
- Good offroad capabilities for a crossover
- Marginal offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- More a facelift than a new model
- Ugly
- Crossover nonsense
- Only available with tiny engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.