Compare Jeep Wrangler JK vs Jeep Wrangler Unlimited JL vs Volvo XC90 II
Variants
2.8 CRDi Sahara 4x4 AT
2.8 CRDi Sport 4x4
2.8 CRDi Sport 4x4
3.6 Sahara 4x4 AT
3.8 Rubicon 4x4 AT
3.8 Sahara 4x4
3.8 Sahara 4x4 AT
3.8 Sport 4x4
2.0 Rubicon
2.0 Rubicon PHEV 4xe
2.0 Sport
2.2 Rubicon
2.2 Sahara
3.0 Rubicon EcoDiesel
3.0 Sport EcoDiesel
6.4 Rubicon 392 V8
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
D5 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 AWD AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 AWD AT
T8 Euro6d AWD AT
T8 AWD AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
142 L / 5.0 cu-ft ~ 430 L / 15.2 cu-ft
Passengers
4
5
Payload
672 kg / 1482 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Chassis Type
Body on frame
Offroad | Approach Angle
23.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
21.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Solid axle
Leading link, Solid axle
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Trailing arm, Solid axle
Multi-link
Water Fording
762 mm / 30.0 in
450 mm / 17.7 in
Construction
Body Style
3-door SUV
Mid-size SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1776 mm / 69.9 in
Size | Length
4950 mm / 194.9 in
Size | Width
1873 mm / 73.7 in
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2424 mm / 95.4 in
2984 mm / 117.5 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
36.0 m / 118.1 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.495
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Fuel Capacity
21.5 gal
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Debut
2017-12 (LA Auto Show)
Made In
USA
Reviews
Neofiliac score
75%
88%
70%
Pros
- Iconic styling
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Small turning circle
- Good towing capacity
- Open roof design
- Iconic styling
- Large V8 available
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Body-on-frame
- Solid axle
- Some offroad capabilities
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Horrid 0.49 drag coefficient
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Low build quality
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.