Compare Hyundai Santa Fe 3 vs Renault Captur vs Hyundai Venue

Variants
2.0 CRDi 150
2.0 CRDi 150 AWD
2.2 CRDi 197
2.2 CRDi 197 AWD
2.2 CRDi 197 AWD AT
2.2 CRDi 200
2.2 CRDi 200 AWD
2.2 CRDi 200 AWD AT
2.2 CRDi 200 AT
2.4 GDI 188
2.4 GDI 188 AT
2.4 GDI 192
2.4 GDI 192 AWD
2.4 GDI 192 AT
2.4 MPI
2.4 MPI AWD
2.4 MPI AWD AT
3.3 MPi AWD AT
Sport 2.0 Turbo GDI AT
Sport 2.0 Turbo GDI AWD AT
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT
1.0 Turbo GDI
1.0 Turbo GDI DCT
1.2 MPI
1.4 CRDi
1.6 MPI
1.6 MPI CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
529 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 903 L / 31.9 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
16.5 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
16.6 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
21.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Length
4122 mm / 162.3 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in
Track Width | Front
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Weight
1024.0 kg / 2257.5 lbs
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
42.4 m / 139.1 ft

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
11.2:1
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
55%
1%
7%
Pros
  • Improved exterior design
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good towing capacity
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Cheap to purchase
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Both ugly and forgettable
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Questionable reliability
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.