Compare Infiniti QX56 vs Ford Expedition 4 vs Nissan Armada
Variants
5.6 313
5.6 313 AWD
5.6 320
5.6 320 AWD
5.6 325
5.6 325 AWD
4WD
RWD
5.6 317 4WD
5.6 317
5.6 305
5.6 309 4WD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
1733 L / 61.2 cu-ft
547 L / 19.3 cu-ft ~ 2962 L / 104.6 cu-ft
566 L / 20.0 cu-ft ~ 2750 L / 97.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
106.0 L / 28.0 gal
88.0 L / 23.2 gal
106.0 L / 28.0 gal
Passengers
8
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
265/70 R18
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
270 mm / 10.6 in
249 mm / 9.8 in
250 mm / 9.8 in
Size | Height
1913 mm / 75.3 in
Size | Length
5334 mm / 210.0 in
5255 mm / 206.9 in
Size | Width
2029 mm / 79.9 in | 2372 mm / 93.4 in (mirror unfolded) | 2123 mm / 83.6 in (mirror folded)
2002 mm / 78.8 in
Track Width | Front
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
1717.0 mm / 67.6 in
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
1707.0 mm / 67.2 in
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
3130 mm / 123.2 in
3112 mm / 122.5 in
3130 mm / 123.2 in
Performance
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
185.0 km/h / 115.0 mph
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
98.0 mm / 3.9 in
98.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.8:1
10.0:1
9.8:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
5.6 L / 338.8 cu-in / 5552.0 cc
Engine | Power
375.0 hp / 279.6 kW @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
107.3 hp/L / 1.8 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Torque
637 Nm / 469.8 lb-ft @ 2250 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Bi-turbocharged direct-injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
10-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic SelectShift
Automatic
Production
Availability
2017
Debut
2017 Chicago Auto Show
Made In
USA
Reviews
Neofiliac score
73%
83%
60%
Pros
- Sophisticated suspension setup
- High drivetrain reliability
- Wonderful interior quality
- Superb offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- High cargo capacity
- Very imposing exterior
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Poor offroad capabilities for an SUV
- Very high fuel consumption
- Limited to V6
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Very high fuel consumption
- Poor handling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.