Compare Renault Koleos 2 vs Renault Kadjar vs Renault Koleos 2

Variants
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi CVT
2.0 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi 4x4
2.0 dCi 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi CVT
2.5 4x4 CVT
1.2 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 AWD
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi CVT
2.0 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi 4x4
2.0 dCi 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi CVT
2.5 4x4 CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
409 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 1478 L / 52.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
10.7 m / 35.2 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
200 mm / 7.9 in
210 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1673 mm / 65.9 in
1607 mm / 63.3 in
1673 mm / 65.9 in
Size | Length
4449 mm / 175.2 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2063 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1864 mm / 73.4 in (mirror folded)
1836 mm / 72.3 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2063 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1864 mm / 73.4 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2705 mm / 106.5 in
2646 mm / 104.2 in
2705 mm / 106.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.353
0.353

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
80.0 mm / 3.1 in
80.0 mm / 3.1 in
Engine | Stroke
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
28%
4%
28%
Pros
  • Coherent exterior design
  • Good towing capacity
  • Basic offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Coherent exterior design
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • CMiserably low engine output
  • Poor build quality
  • Horrible styling
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.