Compare Renault Koleos 2 vs Kia Soul vs Renault Captur
Variants
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi CVT
2.0 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi 4x4
2.0 dCi 4x4 CVT
2.0 dCi CVT
2.5 4x4 CVT
1.6
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi AT
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft ~ 570 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
410 kg / 904 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Tire Size
195/65R15
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
10.5 m / 34.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1673 mm / 65.9 in
1661 mm / 65.4 in
Size | Length
4105 mm / 161.6 in
4122 mm / 162.3 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in | 2063 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1864 mm / 73.4 in (mirror folded)
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1591.0 mm / 62.6 in
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Weight
1270.0 kg / 2799.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2705 mm / 106.5 in
2550 mm / 100.4 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.353
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
80.0 mm / 3.1 in
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
79.2 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
79.5 mm / 3.1 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
28%
14%
1%
Pros
- Coherent exterior design
- Good towing capacity
- Distinct styling
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Both ugly and forgettable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.