HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Renault Koleos vs Renault Kadjar vs Renault Koleos

Variants
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 173 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 175 Euro5 4x4
2.5 170
2.5 170 4x4
2.5 170 4x4 CVT
2.5 170 CVT
1.2 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 AWD
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 173 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 175 Euro5 4x4
2.5 170
2.5 170 4x4
2.5 170 4x4 CVT
2.5 170 CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1380 L / 48.7 cu-ft
409 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 1478 L / 52.2 cu-ft
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1380 L / 48.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
10.7 m / 35.2 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
200 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1695 mm / 66.7 in
1607 mm / 63.3 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Size | Length
4520 mm / 178.0 in
4449 mm / 175.2 in
4520 mm / 178.0 in
Size | Width
1836 mm / 72.3 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2690 mm / 105.9 in
2646 mm / 104.2 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
23%
4%
23%
Pros
  • Relatively adequate engines
  • Basic offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Relatively adequate engines
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • CMiserably low engine output
  • Poor build quality
  • Horrible styling
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.