Compare Opel Crossland X vs Opel Antara vs Chevrolet Captiva
Variants
1.2 81
1.2 83
1.2 Turbo 110
1.2 Turbo 110 AT
1.2 Turbo 110 Euro6d
1.2 Turbo 110 Euro6d AT
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d
1.2 Turbo 130
1.2 Turbo 130 Euro6d AT
1.5d 102
1.5d 120 AT
1.6 120
1.6 99
2.0 CDTI 127
2.2 CDTI 163 AT
2.2 CDTI 163 AWD AT
2.2 CDTI 163 AWD
2.2 CDTI 184 AWD AT
2.2 CDTI 184 AWD
2.2 CDTI 184
2.2 CDTI 184 AT
2.4 167 AWD
2.4 167 AWD AT
2.4 167
2.4 167 AT
2.4 150
2.4 150 AT
3.2 227
2.0 VCDi 127
2.0 VCDi 127 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT
2.2 VCDi 163
2.2 VCDi 163 AT
2.2 VCDi 163 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AT
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT
2.4
2.4 AWD
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 Ecotec 167
2.4 Ecotec 167 AT
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.2 AWD AT
Sport 2.4 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
410 L / 14.5 cu-ft ~ 1255 L / 44.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5 / 7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
22.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Trailing arm
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/70 R16
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1605 mm / 63.2 in
Size | Length
4212 mm / 165.8 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1513.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2604 mm / 102.5 in
2707 mm / 106.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
6%
19%
45%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Not the worst vehicle on the market
- Reasonable drivetrain reliability
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Rather ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Very ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.