Compare Opel Antara vs Chevrolet Equinox 3
Variants
2.0 CDTI 127
2.2 CDTI 163 AT
2.2 CDTI 163 AWD AT
2.2 CDTI 163 AWD
2.2 CDTI 184 AWD AT
2.2 CDTI 184 AWD
2.2 CDTI 184
2.2 CDTI 184 AT
2.4 167 AWD
2.4 167 AWD AT
2.4 167
2.4 167 AT
2.4 150
2.4 150 AT
3.2 227
1.5
1.5 AWD
1.5
1.6d
1.6d AWD
2.0
2.0 AWD
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Trailing arm
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/70 R16
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2707 mm / 106.6 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
19%
19%
Pros
- Not the worst vehicle on the market
- Cheap to purchase
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.