Compare Opel Antara vs Chevrolet Traverse vs Chevrolet Captiva
Variants
2.0 CDTI 127
2.2 CDTI 163 AT
2.2 CDTI 163 AWD AT
2.2 CDTI 163 AWD
2.2 CDTI 184 AWD AT
2.2 CDTI 184 AWD
2.2 CDTI 184
2.2 CDTI 184 AT
2.4 167 AWD
2.4 167 AWD AT
2.4 167
2.4 167 AT
2.4 150
2.4 150 AT
3.2 227
281 AWD
281 FWD
288 AWD
288 FWD
2.0 VCDi 127
2.0 VCDi 127 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT
2.2 VCDi 163
2.2 VCDi 163 AT
2.2 VCDi 163 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AT
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT
2.4
2.4 AWD
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 Ecotec 167
2.4 Ecotec 167 AT
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.2 AWD AT
Sport 2.4 AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
83.3 L / 22.0 gal
Passengers
5
5 / 7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs, 331 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
22.7 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Trailing arm
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/70 R16
245/70 R17, 255/65 R18, 255/55 R20
Turning Circle
12.3 m / 40.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
183 mm / 7.2 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Wheel Size
16 in
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 20
Wheelbase
2707 mm / 106.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Towing Capacity
2358 kg / 5199 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic 6T75
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
19%
21%
45%
Pros
- Not the worst vehicle on the market
- High cargo capacity
- Rather reliable powertrain
- Reasonable drivetrain reliability
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very bland, unfinished styling
- Very ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.