Compare Peugeot 4007 vs Peugeot 5008 II facelift vs Peugeot 2008

Variants
2.2D
2.2D AT
2.4
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
510 L / 18.0 cu-ft ~ 1686 L / 59.5 cu-ft
702 L / 24.8 cu-ft ~ 2150 L / 75.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
56.0 L / 14.8 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
7
5
Payload
620 kg / 1367 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
236 mm / 9.3 in
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1715 mm / 67.5 in
1646 mm / 64.8 in
1556 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4636 mm / 182.5 in
4641 mm / 182.7 in
4159 mm / 163.7 in
Size | Width
1805 mm / 71.1 in
1844 mm / 72.6 in
1739 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1601.0 mm / 63.0 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Weight
1790.0 kg / 3946.3 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
17 in, 18 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2537 mm / 99.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6
Engine
2.4 l 16V 125 kW
Engine | Bore
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Stroke
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
90.5 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2007 ~ 2012
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
34%
24%
2%
Pros
  • Fully independent suspension setup
  • Decent styling
  • High cargo capacity
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to fix
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Very ugly indeed
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.