Compare Peugeot 4007 vs SEAT Arona vs Peugeot 2008

Variants
2.2D
2.2D AT
2.4
1.0 EcoTSI 115
1.0 EcoTSI 115 DSG
1.0 EcoTSI 95
1.0 TGI 90
1.0 TSI 115
1.0 TSI 115 DSG
1.0 TSI 95
1.5 TSI 150
1.6 MPI 110
1.6 MPI 110 AT
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 95
1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d
1.6 TDI 95 DSG
1.6 TDI 95 Euro6d DSG
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
510 L / 18.0 cu-ft ~ 1686 L / 59.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
620 kg / 1367 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.1 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
29.5 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
190 mm / 7.5 in
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1715 mm / 67.5 in
1556 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4636 mm / 182.5 in
4138 mm / 162.9 in
4159 mm / 163.7 in
Size | Width
1805 mm / 71.1 in
1739 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1503.0 mm / 59.2 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1486.0 mm / 58.5 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Weight
1790.0 kg / 3946.3 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2566 mm / 101.0 in
2537 mm / 99.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
2.4 l 16V 125 kW
Engine | Bore
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2007 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
34%
13%
2%
Pros
  • Fully independent suspension setup
  • Looks good from some angles
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to fix
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Very ugly indeed
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.