Compare Fiat Sedici facelift vs Renault Kadjar vs Renault Captur
Variants
1.6 4X2
1.6 4X2 AT
1.6 4X4
2.0 4X4
1.2 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 AWD
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 670 L / 23.7 cu-ft
409 L / 14.4 cu-ft ~ 1478 L / 52.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Tire Size
205/60 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.7 m / 35.2 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
200 mm / 7.9 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1620 mm / 63.8 in
1607 mm / 63.3 in
Size | Length
4115 mm / 162.0 in
4449 mm / 175.2 in
4122 mm / 162.3 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
1836 mm / 72.3 in | 2058 mm / 81.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
1542.0 mm / 60.7 in
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
Wheel Size
16 in
16 in, 17 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2500 mm / 98.4 in
2646 mm / 104.2 in
2606 mm / 102.6 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2014
2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
12%
4%
1%
Pros
- New FWD version is less pretentious
- Basic offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspension
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- CMiserably low engine output
- Poor build quality
- Horrible styling
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Both ugly and forgettable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.