Compare Volvo XC90 II vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport (L320) vs Volvo XC90 II

Volvo XC90 II

Land Rover Range Rover Sport (L320)

Volvo XC90 II

Volvo XC90 IILand Rover Range Rover Sport (L320)Volvo XC90 II
Variants
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
D5 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 AWD AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 AWD AT
T8 Euro6d AWD AT
T8 AWD AT
2.7 TDV6
3.0 TDV6 211
3.0 TDV6 245
3.0 TDV6 256
3.6 TDV8 Euro5
3.6 TDV8
4.2 V8 Supercharged
4.4 V8
5.0 V8
5.0 V8 Supercharged
D4 AT
D4 AWD AT
D5 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 Euro6d AWD AT
T5 AWD AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 AWD AT
T8 Euro6d AWD AT
T8 AWD AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score70%78%70%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
  • Interesting, though not the most reliable, engine lineup
  • Superb offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • High 0.37 drag coefficient
  • Electrical problems
  • Only available with small engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.